Re: [wsrm] New Issue: Is wsrm extensible?

["iwasa" <kiwasa@jp.fujitsu.com>]

In principle, I think we can follow the same
position that SOAP has. SOAP is considered
to be extended. And I think there is possibility
this spec to be extended, so we do not have
to preclude those extensibility.

Iwasa

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Werden" <scottw@wrq.com>
To: <wsrm@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 3:28 AM
Subject: [wsrm] New Issue: Is wsrm extensible?


>
> Is it a requirement (or not) that WSRM be extensible?
>
> If we think this is pretty much a stand-alone spec, extensibility is
> probably not important, but if we think variations will emerge in the
future
> (e.g., a WS-ReliabilityPolicy), then we should build in extensibility.
This
> is important for how the schema is designed.
>
> Scott Werden
>
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php
>