[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] New Issue: Is wsrm extensible?
Tom, Yes, I think we need to add extensibility elements in the schema. Thanks, Iwasa > iwasa wrote: > > In principle, I think we can follow the same > > position that SOAP has. SOAP is considered > > to be extended. And I think there is possibility > > this spec to be extended, so we do not have > > to preclude those extensibility. > > > > Iwasa > > Do we want to put extensibility elements in the Schema (i.e. sequence of > ANY) to allow adding additional elements to the complex header types later? > > Tom Rutt > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Scott Werden" <scottw@wrq.com> > > To: <wsrm@lists.oasis-open.org> > > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 3:28 AM > > Subject: [wsrm] New Issue: Is wsrm extensible? > > > > > > > >>Is it a requirement (or not) that WSRM be extensible? > >> > >>If we think this is pretty much a stand-alone spec, extensibility is > >>probably not important, but if we think variations will emerge in the > > > > future > > > >>(e.g., a WS-ReliabilityPolicy), then we should build in extensibility. > > > > This > > > >>is important for how the schema is designed. > >> > >>Scott Werden > >> > >>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting > > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php > > > > > > > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php > > > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------- > Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@fsw.fujitsu.com > Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133 > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]