[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] [Fwd: Re: Our original Reliability spec] -encouraging broader participation
All I agree 100% with what Doug wrote To encourage broader participation, why not invite other companies that are not now participating in our TC to review our WS-RM Reqts doc with the intention of then submitting a multi-company contribution which would enhance/ augment it. Alternatively, they could submit a contribution detailing how their spec(s) meet our WS-RM Reqts document, with the actual spec(s) submitted as a companion contribution. If we reach consensus on such an invitation, perhaps Tom could send it via email to selected individuals (I think I could compile a partial email list) by late next week Could this be a topic for Tuesday's conference call? alan Alan Weissberger NEC-Labs America ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:53:44 -0700 To: tom@coastin.com Subject: Re: [wsrm] [Fwd: Re: Our original Reliability spec] > On 11-Jul-03 08:06, Tom Rutt wrote: > > I agree with you. Thus anyone who uses the URL MUST BE AWARE of any > > encumbrances > > attached to it. > > > > Please read the IPR and license terms before you do anything with the > > URLs I sent out. > Alternatively, do *nothing* with the information at the provided URLs in > the context of this TC to avoid violating the charter [1] of this group, > especially our Standing Rules. We are here to discuss our > specification, any formal submissions and not every published reliable > delivery white paper. > > We should strongly encourage the submission of additional technical work > from all sources to avoid confusion, industry division and overall > fragmentation of Web services standards. Additional peer review and > input throughout the life cycle of this TC specification will also > improve it technically. > > As our charter says [1], "Other contributions in addition to > WS-Reliability will be accepted for consideration without any prejudice > or restrictions, and evaluated on their technical merit, as long as the > contributions conform to this charter." > > > Tom Rutt > ... > > thanx, > doug > > [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsrm/charter.php > > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]