OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsrm] Action item for ReplyTo definition



I think we need to discuss how Fault should be sent back (Fault Binding Patterns (FBPs)?) before
designing ReplyTo details.
We have defined Ack Binding Patterns (ABP) (Response,Callback,Polling).
If ack is requested, we can assume ABP = FBP.
So, what if ack is not requested? Should we specify FBP (Response, Callback, Polling)?
What about relationship between bindings of application fault messages (MEP?) and
ws-rm fault messages (FBP)?

Junichi Tatemura

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Rutt" <tom@coastin.com>
To: "Patrick Yee" <kcyee@cecid.hku.hk>
Cc: "wsrm" <wsrm@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Action item for ReplyTo definition


> Patrick Yee wrote:
> 
> > Another thinking.
> > I understand the motivation to put ReplyTo under AckRequested. But 
> > ReplyTo is not limited to acknowledgment as stated. It will be the 
> > endpoint for sending fault messages as well. Where should I locate the 
> > ReplyTo URL for sending fault messages if AckRequested is not used? 
> 
> Good point. Reply to could be used for other things, in general.
> 
> However, if ack is not requested in a callback pattern manner, why is 
> the fault not just
> sent in the HTTP response?  When will a request using the request or 
> polling ack patern
> need to send a fault in a callback?
> 
> Tom Rutt
> 
> >
> >
> > Regards, -Patrick
> >
> >
> > Tom Rutt wrote:
> >
> >> This mail is my contribution for fixing the definition for ReplyTo 
> >> element. I also made necessary
> >> changes to the ackRequested element to get rid of the words 
> >> "asynchronous" and "synchronous".
> >>
> >> --------------------
> >>
> >> The current text states:
> >>
> >> “
> >>
> >> *3.2.2. ReplyTo Element*
> >>
> >> This is a REQUIRED element, used to specify the initial sender’s 
> >> endpoint to receive an
> >>
> >> asynchronous Acknowledgment message or Fault Message. The value of 
> >> this element is
> >>
> >> REQUIRED to be URL as defined in [RFC 1738].
> >>
> >> “
> >>
> >> However this does not properly reflect the differences between use of 
> >> the reply
> >>
> >> acknowledgment binding pattern and the callback acknowledgement pattern.
> >>
> >> Lets first modify the definition for the AckRequested element to 
> >> change the use of the
> >>
> >> terms synchronous and asynchronous to the new terms “reply 
> >> acknowledgment pattern”
> >>
> >> and “callback acknowledgement pattern”.
> >>
> >> “*3.2.4. AckRequested Element*
> >>
> >> The AckRequested element is an OPTIONAL element. It is REQUIRED for
> >>
> >> guaranteeing message delivery and message order. However this element 
> >> MUST NOT
> >>
> >> appear in a non-Reliable Message. This element is to be used for a 
> >> sender to request the
> >>
> >> receiver to send back an Acknowledgment message for the message sent. 
> >> The
> >>
> >> AckRequested element contains the following attribute:
> >>
> >> - an *ackPattern *attribute
> >>
> >> *(1) ackPattern attribute*
> >>
> >> The ackPattern attribute is an OPTIONAL attribute. This attribute is 
> >> used to specify
> >>
> >> whether the Acknowledgment Message should be sent back directly in 
> >> the reply to the reliable message or
> >>
> >> in a separate callback request. This attribute, when used, MUST have 
> >> one of the following two values.
> >>
> >> The default value of this attribute is “Reply”, when omitted.
> >>
> >> - *Reply *: An Acknowledgment Message MUST be sent back directly in 
> >> the Reply to the Reliable Message.
> >>
> >> - *Callback*: An Acknowledgment Message MUST be sent as a callback 
> >> request, using the address in the
> >>
> >> ReplyTo element
> >>
> >> “
> >>
> >> With this modification the ReplyTo definition can be modified as 
> >> follows:
> >>
> >> “
> >>
> >> *3.2.2. ReplyTo Element*
> >>
> >> This is an OPTIONAL element, used to specify the initial sender’s 
> >> endpoint to receive a callback
> >>
> >> Acknowledgment message or Fault Message. A value of this element MUST 
> >> be present in the request
> >>
> >> message if the AckRequested element indicates that the Callback 
> >> Acknowledgement pattern is requested.
> >>
> >> If present, the ReplyTo element is required to be URL as defined in 
> >> [RFC 1738].
> >>
> >> “
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting 
> > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php 
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@fsw.fujitsu.com
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php
> 
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]