Re: [wsrm] [REL-XX]Proposal for POLL RM-Reply Pattern

[Sunil Kunisetty <sunil.kunisetty@oracle.com>]

 
 Patrick,

 I didn't cook up this requirement. I was just pointing to an existing one
 and my proposal was based on that.

 If it changes, I'll rework my proposal based on the new requirement.

 -Sunil

Patrick Yee wrote:

IMHO, practically those persisted message IDs have to be cleaned up regularly. Or else the persistence storage will be growing larger and larger without limit. In fact, I think at some time a persisted message ID can be cleaned up safely, depending on the message expire time and the time need to complete all retries.

Regards, -Patrick
 
 

 >> If someone asks for the status of a message that was successfully
 >> passed on to the application layer or that expired and was purged,

 One of the current requirement reads "The receiver MUST persist the
 Message ID to support duplicate elimination". So to support this
 requirement, we anyway need to archive the ID.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php.