[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Rel YY
It also simplifies things for implementers as object creation goes as the header and message order elements weren't contained in a common RM envelope. On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 05:52 PM, Tom Rutt wrote: > Jacques Durand wrote: > >> Sunil, Bob, >> >> I think your revised proposal is compatible with the concerns that >> motivated mine. >> >> >> > I prefer MessageOrder (or what ever is the name) sub-element as the >> > triggering mechanism rather than the value of some attribute or >> sub-element >> > to distinguish the category. >> >> I favor this too: more consistent with what we do for ack requested, >> dup elimination. >> >> Jacques >> > > I really do not care that much, but the messageOrder element, when we > took sequenceNumber > out, had no data but only the status attribute. By putting the status > attribute with the sequenceNumber, we got rid of the now awkward > orphaned messageOrder shema structure. > > If we are not going to move sequenceNumber back with messageOrder, I > think the schema > we have is more concise. This is, as always, a matter of style > preferences and artistic viewpoints. > > Tom Rutt > >> >> >> > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------- > Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@fsw.fujitsu.com > Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133 > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster > of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/ > leave_workgroup.php. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]