[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] [REL-XX]Proposal for POLL RM-Reply Pattern
Scott, Scott Werden wrote: > I agree with Sunil's conclusion that the poll operation should not be in the > soap body but his discussion raises some other issues. The issue of Body vs. > Header is really orthogonal to WSDL. Having a WSDL description of the RMP's > poll service may be desribable even if the operation is in the header. I can If it is a Header, one can always define it in the (WSDL) SOAP Binding section for that PortType/Port. Alternatively, we should use the WSDL Annotation stuff which is pending (I'll work on it after we close this issue) on my AI list. > > see this being useful, for instance, if there is an intermediary (or proxy) > that needs to know about all the services that an endpoint will be > providing. Additionally, how is the SOAPAction header being set without a > WSDL? We have no RM field to specify that. Scott, could you clarify what SOAPAction has to do with RM? -Sunil > > > Scott > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sunil Kunisetty [mailto:sunil.kunisetty@oracle.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:34 AM > > To: wsrm@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: Re: [wsrm] [REL-XX]Proposal for POLL RM-Reply Pattern > > > > > > > > All, > > > > Attached is my document with my comments and requirements list. > > > > -Sunil > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]