[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Do we really need GroupMaxIdleTime?
I had a thought. If we allow open ended groups with the latest expiry time (asssuming a monotonic increasing sequence of message expiry times for the group) serving as the effective groupExpiryTime (as I have previously proposed), there might not be a need for the groupMaxIdleTime parameter. If a sender wants to trigger the group termination from a max idle condition, it can start sending its mesages with an expiry time far enough into the future to be greater than the current time plus the desired GroupMaxIdleDuration value. The behaviour of the receiver rmp will be the same as if there were a GroupMaxIdleDuration. Also, I question whether there are any use cases for using both a GroupExpiryTime and a GroupMaxIdleDuration parameter in the same group sequence. Perhaps we can get rid of the GroupMaxIdleDuration element althogether! Tom Rutt -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@fsw.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]