Re: [wsrm] WS-Reliability inconsistent with WS-I ??

[Sunil Kunisetty <sunil.kunisetty@oracle.com>]

 Mark,

 It does matter and hence for the same reason we prohibited Response reply pattern
 for WSDL one-way messages.

 One-way operations hence can only use either the Callback or Poll pattern. The
 latter is needed for the behind-the-firewall cases.

 -Sunil

Mark Hansen wrote:

Does it matter to this TC that using the HTTP response to return a WS-Reliability ACK or Fault from WSDL "one-way" endpoints violates the WS-I Basic Profile (see R2714)?  To me, that would seem to be a good reason to NOT endorse using the HTTP response in this way, and instead to send ACK/Fault as a separate HTTP req/resp (what we used to call "asynchronous response").

Perhaps you have addressed this issue, and I just missed it (in which case I appologize).