Re: [wsrm] Proposal to resolve REL-49

[Jishnu Mukerji <jishnu@hp.com>]

Sunil Kunisetty wrote:

> Hi Jishnu,
>
> <snip>
>
>  
>
>>1. The intended scope of use of this framework as an extension point in
>>WSDL1.1 is constrained to be within the WS-RM spec. This will not be
>>advertised in the WS-RM spec as a standalone framework for use in WSDL
>>1.1 in general.
>>
>>    
>>
>
> <snip>
>
> Just a clarification, so are you suggesting that though these compositors have
> a generic namespace (i.e., they don't use WS-RM namespace), we do say
> in our specification that this is not a standalone framework and rather should
> only be used with WS-RM specification.
>
> I'm not trying to suggest one way or other, but trying to clarify (or rather reconfirm)
> what you meant.
>
> 
>

I think in principle the preference is to make it more difficult rather 
than less to use this framework disconnected from the WS-RM use of it. 
The technical details of what makes sense is open to discussion IMHO.

Does that answer your request for clarification?

Jishnu.

-- 
Jishnu Mukerji
Senior Systems Architect          1001 Frontier Road, Suite 300
Technology Office                 Bridgewater NJ 08807, USA
Management Software Organization  Tel: +1 908 243 8924
Hewlett-Packard Company           Fax: +1 908 243 8850
                                  mailto: jishnu@hp.com