Re: [wsrm] Rel49 Features & Properties proposal.

[Jishnu Mukerji <jishnu@hp.com>]

Consistent with the principle that I stated in the telecon......

1) Do we use Features & Properties or something else?

Since the only concrete proposal on the table is the FnP one and we are time constrained, it is prudent to use the FnP proposal.

2) Should it's use be limited to WSDL1.1 RM spec with a statement that we will migrate to whatever the industry standard becomes?

Yes. 

I would however qualify the "whatever the industry standard becomes" to say that here we a referring to the industry standard for specification of Web Service Definition. 

3) Should we use the Oracle namespace or an RM one?

To give a clear message regarding (2) we should use the RM namespace.

Our position is that the three positions articulated above are indivisible, i.e. the positions taken individually do not hold. They hold together as a package.

Regards,

Jishnu.

-- 
Jishnu Mukerji
Senior Systems Architect          1001 Frontier Road, Suite 300
Technology Office                 Bridgewater NJ 08807, USA
Management Software Organization  Tel: +1 908 243 8924
Hewlett-Packard Company           Fax: +1 908 243 8850
                                  mailto: jishnu@hp.com