[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Can a second public review be less than 30 days]
Karl answered my question, Public reviews have to be minimum 30 days, for now. -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
--- Begin Message ---
- From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>
- To: Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 10:20:51 -0400
Tom: Under the current Process each review must be minimum 30 days. That is likely to change with a revision being made to the Process, but for now that's the interpretation. -Karl Tom Rutt wrote: > > > The process states: > " > > _Public Review_ > > Before the TC can submit its Committee Draft to OASIS membership for > review and approval as an OASIS Standard, the TC must conduct a public > review of the work. The decision by the TC to submit the work for public > review requires a majority vote. The review must be announced by the TC > Administrator on the OASIS members mail list and optionally on other > public mail lists. Review must take place for a minimum of 30 days, > during which time no changes may be made to the document. Comments must > be collected via the TC's archived public comment facility. The TC must > record the comments received as well as the resolution of those comments. > > The TC may conduct any number of additional review cycles (i.e. > collecting comments, making edits to the specification, sending out a > revised version for review again, etc.) before deciding that the review > is complete. If substantive changes are made to the specification after > the start of the public review then the TC should conduct another review > cycle. After the conclusion of the review and final changes to the > document, the TC must re-approve the work as a Committee Draft before > submitting it to OASIS. > " > > While it states that the first review must be at least 30 Days, it is > not clear whether a subsequent pubic review (say to allow reveiw of a > large number of editorial changes due to public review comments) must > also be 30 > days. > > My committee asked me to ask you if you would announce a second public > review which would be for less than 30 days? > (say one or two weeks). > > Tom Rutt > WSRM Chair > -- ================================================================= Karl F. Best Vice President, OASIS office +1 978.667.5115 x206 mobile +1 978.761.1648 karl.best@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org--- End Message ---
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]