[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrm] Proposed resolutions for ChrisF issues 3,4,6,8,10
1) and 2) follow-up: <JD> in addition to proposed resolution (previous emails), we need to fix - or explain - the way we name these operations: we call them currently "RMP operations" at various places, but as noted these abstract operations are not necessarily supported by the RMP. So to be more precise we could rename them (QoS operations? or transfer operations?) or just explain that this naming does not mean all these ops are supported by an RMP. </JD> +1 I propose RM operations: they are certainly associated with Reliable Messaging, if not necessarily Reliable Messaging Processors. Mark Peel Web Services Infrastructure Novell, Inc.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]