[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Draft Submission letter for TC review
here is the draft submission letter for TC review. Please provide any comments before Thursday Morning. Tom Rutt WSRM TC Chair ---------------- Draft Submission Letter for WS-Reliability 1.1 1. A formal specification that is a valid member of its type, together with appropriate documentation for the specification, both of which must be written using approved OASIS templates. Zip file at: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/8928/WS-Reliability-CD1086.zip containing the following five files: WS-Reliability-CD1086.pdf WS-Reliability version 1.1, CD 1.086 ws-reliability-1.1.xsd Ws-Reliability schema reference-1.1.xsd Reference type schema fnp-1.1.xsd Features and Properties schema wsrmfp-1.1.xsd wsrm features and properties schema 2. A clear English-language summary of the specification. WS-Reliability version 1.1 specifies a SOAP Module (as defined by [SOAP 1.2]), which fulfills reliable messaging requirements that are critical in some applications of Web Services. The WS-Reliabilty Specification, version 1.1, specifies a transport-agnostic protocol based on SOAP for providing quality of service in the reliable delivery of messages. This specification defines the following reliability features: - Guaranteed message delivery, or At-Least-Once delivery semantics. - Guaranteed message duplicate elimination, or At-Most-Once delivery semantics. - Guaranteed message delivery and duplicate elimination, or Exactly-Once delivery semantics. - Guaranteed message ordering for delivery, within a group of messages. 3. A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing organizations. This specification has been designed to be used in combination with other complementary protocols, and has built upon previous experiences from the ebXML Message Service [ebMS].) Both WS-Reliability and ebMS have same messaging reliability contracts as objectives: guaranteed delivery, no duplicate delivery, ordered delivery, and combinations of these. However, WS-Reliability has improved on scalability and performance by generalizing the use of sequence numbers, and can accommodate different security and access conditions on each party, as this is more frequently the case with a Web service and its clients, compared to more symmetrical access conditions in messaging. The reliability contract is more "application-oriented" in WS-R, where acknowledgment is on final delivery, in contrast to "on receipt" by the message handler in ebMS. 4. Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that they are successfully using the specification consistently with the OASIS IPR Policy. The chair has received statements from the following TC member organizations. We include pointers to the e-mail archive record of the statements made. <note the following letters do not explicity mention WS-Reliability CD 1.086, and should be updated by the member companies to add the explicit reference to the CD> Hitachi: http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00050.html Fujitsu http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00084.html Oracle: http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00081.html NEC: http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00121.html 5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public review period, along with its resolution. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/7725/PublicCommentsIsssues-070604OutputB.html 6. An account of and results of the voting to approve the specification as a Committee Draft. TC roll call vote at teleconf on August 24, 2004 Name Company Vote for CD 1.086 --------------- ------------------- ------------------ Joseph Chiusano Booz Allen Hamilton y Jeff Turpin Cyclone Commerce y Jacques Durand Fujitsu y Kazunori Iwasa Fujitsu Not present Tom Rutt Fujitsu y Jishnu Mukerji Hewlett-Packard Not present Robert Freund Hitachi y Eisaku Nishiyama Hitachi y Nobuyuki Yamamoto Hitachi Not present Junichi Tatemura NEC Corporation y Alan Weissberger NEC Corporation y Abbie Barbir Nortel Networks y Mark Peel Novell y Sunil Kunisetty Oracle y Jeff Mischkinsky Oracle Not present Pete Wenzel SeeBeyond y Doug Bunting Sun Microsystems y Tony Graham Sun Microsystems y Chi-Yuen Ng Univ of Hong Kong y 15 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain, 4 not present 78% of eligible voting members voted yes 0% of eligible voting members voted no 0% of eligible voting members abstained 7. An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification, together with the originating TC's response to each comment. This specification has not been previously submitted to OASIS. 8. A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the originating TC WSRM TC public comment list: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm-comment/ WSRM TC list: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/ 9. A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all members of the TC have been provided with a copy of the OASIS IPR Policy. The TC chair certifies that all members have been reminded to read the IPR statement on numerous occasions and also in an e-mail “Call for IPR disclosure regarding ws-Reliability spec” at: http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200405/msg00022.html 10. Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports submitted by one or more TC members who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee Draft, or certification by the chair that no minority reports exist. No minority reports have been submitted to the chair as of this writing. Submitted by the TC chair, Tom Rutt, trutt@us.fujitsu.com -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]