OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsrm] Corrected WSRM member vote submission letter with correctURLs


Somehow, the html version of the letter (even the corrected one) has a 
screwed up URL, please use the .doc
version.

Tom Rutt

Tom Rutt wrote:

> Karl: I am sorry, but somehow two URLs got screwed up in the previous 
> submission letter I sent..
>
> The url at:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/8936/WS-Reliability-CD1.086.zip 
>
>
> has the corrected logo included.
>
> Somehow i sent the wrong submission letter (an earlier draft) with the 
> wrong url for both
> the CD and the public review comment resolutions..
>
> The correct zip file has CD1.086.zip at the end, the bad file has 
> CD1086 at the end.
>
> I attach a word version and an html version of the corrected 
> submission letter which changes
> two urls.
>
> Please let me know if this gets you to the correct zip file.
>
> The submission is also in open office format at:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/8935/WS-Reliability-CD1.086.sxw 
>
>
> Tom Rutt
> .
>
>
> Karl F. Best wrote:
>
>> Tom:
>>
>> There is one thing that I would like to have done: I noticed that the 
>> spec document uses the old OASIS logo. Could you please replace this 
>> with the latest logo, then create a new PDF and zip file? Then just 
>> give me the link for the new zip (and make sure that it is public 
>> viewable). This is a non-normative change so won't require any TC 
>> approval or changing the document date or rev number, etc.
>>
>> The latest logo is at 
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/spectools/images/oasis.gif, and you can see 
>> an example of its use at 
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/spectools/docs/wd-spectools-word-sample-04.doc
>>
>> Everything else with the submission looks pretty good.
>>
>> -Karl
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Karl F. Best wrote:
>>
>>> I'll announce to members end of Sept. First half of October is 
>>> familiarization, second half is voting. Voting will end 31 October. 
>>> If it's unanimous affirmative then I'll announce the new OS right 
>>> away (1 November), but if there's any negative votes then the TC 
>>> must decide (within 30 days) how to respond.
>>>
>>> -Karl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom Rutt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the ack.
>>>> By the way, we are assuming the member vote will be over by the 
>>>> first week of November. Is this
>>>> a correct assumption? Will be know what all the member comments are 
>>>> by the first week of November?
>>>>
>>>> Tom Rutt
>>>>
>>>> Karl F. Best wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Tom:
>>>>>
>>>>> I received your submission on the 3rd, so that counts as having 
>>>>> met the deadline for the 15th of the month. I'll be checking 
>>>>> through this submission and preparing an announcement to the 
>>>>> membership at the end of month, as required by the TC Process. If 
>>>>> I need any additional information, clarifications, etc. I'll let 
>>>>> you know.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for following up
>>>>> -Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom Rutt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Last week I sent you the WSRM member vote submission for 
>>>>>> WS-Reliability spec, which is archived at:
>>>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200409/msg00010.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you received this, and do I have to do anything else to 
>>>>>> submit it formally before
>>>>>> tomorrow, Sept 15th?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom Rutt
>>>>>> WSRM TC Chair
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Submission Letter for WS-Reliability 1.1
>
>OASIS Web Services Reliable Messaging TC
>
> 
>
> 
>
>1. A formal specification that is a valid member of its type, together 
>
>with appropriate documentation for the specification, both of which 
>
>must be written using approved OASIS templates.
>
> 
>
>Zip file at:  _http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/8936/WS-Reliability-CD1.086.zip_ <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/8928/WS-Reliability-CD1086.zip>  containing the following five files:
>
>   WS-Reliability-CD1.086.pdf WS-Reliability version 1.1, CD 1.086
>
>   ws-reliability-1.1.xsd     Ws-Reliability schema
>
>   reference-1.1.xsd          Reference type schema
>
>   fnp-1.1.xsd                Features and Properties schema
>
>   wsrmfp-1.1.xsd             wsrm features and properties schema
>
> 
>
> 
>
>2. A clear English-language summary of the specification.
>
> 
>
>The WS-Reliabilty specification, version 1.1, specifies a transport-
>
>independent, SOAP based protocol for the reliable delivery of messages.  
>
>Reliable message delivery may be critical to some applications using 
>
>Web Services. 
>
> 
>
>SOAP over HTTP [RFC2616] is not sufficient when an application-level 
>
>messaging protocol must also guarantee some level of reliability and 
>
>security. This specification defines reliability in the context of 
>
>current Web Services standards. 
>
> 
>
>The WS Reliability specification provides the following reliability 
>
>features:
>
> 
>
>- Guaranteed message delivery, or At-Least-Once delivery semantics.
>
>- Guaranteed message duplicate elimination, or "At-Most-Once" delivery
>
>semantics.
>
>- Guaranteed message delivery and duplicate elimination, or "Exactly-
>
>Once" delivery semantics.
>
>- Guaranteed message ordering for delivery within a group of 
>
>(sequential) messages.
>
> 
>
>The WS-Reliabilty specification uses SOAP 1.1 or 1.2 Part 1.  It may be 
>
>used with other transport protocols/bindings besides HTTP. 
>
> 
>
>3. A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to 
>
>similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing 
>
>organizations.
>
> 
>
>This specification has been designed to be used in combination with 
>
>other complementary protocols, and has built upon previous experiences 
>
>from the ebXML Message Service [ebMS].)  Both WS-Reliability and ebMS 
>
>have same messaging reliability contracts as objectives: guaranteed 
>
>delivery, no duplicate delivery, ordered delivery, and combinations of 
>
>these.  
>
> 
>
>However, WS-Reliability has improved on scalability and performance by 
>
>generalizing the use of sequence numbers, and can accommodate different 
>
>security and access conditions on each party, as this is more 
>
>frequently the case with a Web service and its clients, compared to 
>
>more symmetrical access conditions in messaging. The reliability 
>
>contract is more "application-oriented" in WS-R, where acknowledgment 
>
>is on final delivery, in contrast to "on receipt" by the message 
>
>handler in ebMS.
>
> 
>
>4. Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that they 
>
>are successfully using the specification consistently with the OASIS 
>
>IPR Policy.
>
> 
>
>The chair has received statements from the following TC member 
>
>organizations. We include pointers to the e-mail archive record of the statements made.  
>
> 
>
>Hitachi:
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200409/msg00000.html 
>
> 
>
>Fujitsu
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00130.html 
>
> 
>
>Oracle:
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00125.html 
>
> 
>
>NEC:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00127.html <http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00121.html> 
>
> 
>
>5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public 
>
>review period, along with its resolution.
>
> 
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/9025/PublicCommentsIsssues-090204.html 
>
> 
>
>6. An account of and results of the voting to approve the 
>
>specification as a Committee Draft.
>
> 
>
>      TC roll call vote at teleconf on August 24, 2004
>
> 
>
>Name                   Company                Vote for CD 1.086
>
>---------------        -------------------    ------------------
>
>Joseph Chiusano        Booz Allen Hamilton    y
>
>Jeff Turpin            Cyclone Commerce       y
>
>Jacques Durand         Fujitsu                y
>
>Kazunori Iwasa         Fujitsu                Not present
>
>Tom Rutt               Fujitsu                y
>
>Jishnu Mukerji         Hewlett-Packard        Not present
>
>Robert Freund          Hitachi                y
>
>Eisaku Nishiyama       Hitachi                y
>
>Nobuyuki Yamamoto      Hitachi                Not present
>
>Junichi Tatemura       NEC Corporation        y
>
>Alan Weissberger       NEC Corporation        y
>
>Abbie Barbir           Nortel Networks        y
>
>Mark Peel              Novell                 y
>
>Sunil Kunisetty        Oracle                 y
>
>Jeff Mischkinsky       Oracle                 Not present
>
>Pete Wenzel            SeeBeyond              y
>
>Doug Bunting           Sun Microsystems       y
>
>Tony Graham            Sun Microsystems       y
>
>Chi-Yuen Ng            Univ of Hong Kong      y
>
> 
>
>15 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain, 4 not present   
>
> 
>
>78% of eligible voting members voted yes
>
>0% of eligible voting members voted no
>
>0% of eligible voting members abstained
>
> 
>
>7. An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any 
>
>earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification, 
>
>together with the originating TC's response to each comment.
>
> 
>
>This specification has not been previously submitted to OASIS.
>
> 
>
> 
>
>8. A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the originating TC
>
> 
>
>WSRM TC public comment list:
>
>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm-comment/ <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss-comment/>
>
> 
>
>WSRM TC list:
>
>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/
>
> 
>
> 
>
>9. A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all members of 
>
>the TC have been provided with a copy of the OASIS IPR Policy.
>
> 
>
>The TC chair certifies that all members have been reminded to read the 
>
>IPR statement on numerous occasions and also in an e-mail 
>
>“Call for IPR disclosure regarding ws-Reliability spec” at:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200405/msg00022.html 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>10. Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports submitted by one or 
>
>more TC members who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee 
>
>Draft, or certification by the chair that no minority reports exist.
>
> 
>
>No minority reports have been submitted to the chair as of this 
>
>writing. 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>Submitted by the TC chair, Tom Rutt, trutt@us.fujitsu.com <mailto:trutt@us.fujitsu.com>
>
> 
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt	email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]