Re: [wsrm] Successfully Using?

[Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>]

Iwasa,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes it answers my question, plus I found some more about it at [7]

[7] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00067.html

Paul

At 05:13 AM 2004-10-28, iwasa wrote:
>Paul,
>
>Yes, there were some discussions for the letter.
>
>As far as I can recollect, OASIS only requires
>that at least three organizations have some
>experience to use/implement with the spec.
>And the text was to mention it.
>It neither require to implement all of the spec,
>nor interoperability test. So "successfully using"
>means we have implemented something successfully
>with the spec. That is my understanding.
>(TC members, please correct it if my understanding
>  is wrong.)
>
>Is this answering your question?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Iwasa
>Fujitsu Limited
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Paul Denning" <pauld@mitre.org>
>To: <wsrm@lists.oasis-open.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:50 AM
>Subject: [wsrm] Successfully Using?
>
>
> > [2] is a Call for Vote, which references [1].  Item #4 from [1] is copied
> > below with links [3,4,5,6] to certification statements.
> >
> > These statements are very brief, and only say (more or less) xxx has
> > successfully used the WS-Reliability committee draft 1.086 approved for
> > final submission to OASIS, consistent with the OASIS IPR Policy.
> >
> > Is there any discussion of what it means to be "successfully using" this
> > (or any) OASIS spec?
> >
> >
> > [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200409/msg00010.html
> > [2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/members/200410/msg00007.html
> >
> > 4. Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that they
> > are successfully using the specification consistently with the OASIS IPR
> > Policy;
> >
> > The chair has received statements from the following TC member
> > organizations.
> >
> > Hitachi:
> > [3]
> >
><http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200409/msg00000.html>http://www.oas
>is-open.org/archives/wsrm/200409/msg00000.html
> >
> > Fujitsu:
> > [4]
> >
><http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00130.html>http://www.oas
>is-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00130.html
> >
> > Oracle:
> > [5]
> >
><http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00125.html>http://www.oas
>is-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00125.html
> >
> > NEC Corporation:
> > [6]
> >
><http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00127.html>http://www.oas
>is-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00127.html
> >
> > Paul