[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Prelim minutes of 2/21 teleconf
Prelim minutes are attached. Please post corrections to list before next monday. Tom Rutt Chair WSRM TC -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133Title: Full Agenda for WSRM TC Conference Call –June 14, 2005
Prelim minutes WSRM TC Conference Call –Feb
21, 2006 The meeting of the WSRM TC took place by teleconference Time Tuesday, 21 Feb 2006, 05:30pm to 06:30pm ET 1
Draft Agenda:
2) Roll Call 3) Minutes approval 4) Action Items 5) Discussion of potential TC future activities 5.1 Reliability of Response 5.2 Delivery Assertions for Sequences 6) New Business 2 Roll CallAttendance:
Meeting is quorate 3
Minutes Discussion
Tom Rutt
Volunteered to take minutes. 3.1 Approval of previous meeting minutesThe minutes of the 1/24 teleconference meeting are posted at: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/16567/Minutes-wsrmTC012406.htm Bob moved to approve the 1/24
minutes, Jacques seconded. No opposition minutes 1/24 minutes are approved 4 Status of Action Items4.1 Action 012505-1 (Tom Rutt) ClosedOASIS Staff has posted the errata cd as: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/ws-reliability/v1.1/wsrm-ws_reliability-v1.1-errata-cd1.0.pdf The posted standard the errata index is referenced as as: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsrm/documents/errata/1.1/index.html. The errata Index now exists. The action is closed. 1 Discussion of Potential Future TC activitesThe working list of potential enhancements to WS-Reliability was posted after the last f2f as: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/12436/wsReliabityFutureFeatures.htm TC needs to decide among the following possibilities
Just before the last meeting Fujitsu posted the following proposal: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/email/archives/200601/msg00014.html Jacques gave a review of what he proposes. Fujitsu has interest in investigating how two implementations could interoperate. This might extend the charter Within ws-reliability is the question
of reliability of synchronous response.
This seems to be pushed into implementation aspect. WSRX implementers have realiazed
that hter is a gap.
This needs to be handled. Fujitsu
has users of ws-reliability in The other issue is the assertion of Delivery assurance. Do we want to have a new way to handle reliability contract. We have wsdl features and properties in our spec. How much demand is there for requirements in this area. A separate realization of reliability contracts could be investigated. Tom: I would like to investigate an interworking unit from WS-reliability to WS-Reliabile messaging. It would include mappings of DA from one spec to another. I would also like our group to work on interworking units between the two protocols. Jacques: Fujitsu would also like this to be accomplished. This might require the charter to be changed. Investigation is needed. Action: Tom will post a contribution on interworking ws-reliablity with ws rm. 1.1 Reliable Request ResponseJacques posted the following contribution Groups - Reliability of Request-Responses (Reliable-Req-Resp-contribution.doc) uploaded Jacques: If we can express the contract of the response we can handle this requirement. It is a modest expansion to what is there. Action: Jacques will clarify what he thinks we should do to provide reliability on the response. 1.2 Delivery Assertions for SequencesTom: we might want to explore an extension of ws-rm to pass the da negotiation from ws-reliabilty. Jacques; users might be surprised that there is not a standard representation of DA in ws rm. We need to hear from users regarding their requirements. Tom: how many people are using da negotiation in ws reliability. Iwasa: in Tom: how do we find out what DA levels are being used for ws-reliabiltiy Action: Iwasa will try to find out what da levels are being use for ws reiliialbiy. 2 Future MeetingsAt last meeting, TC agreed to decide on the next meeting at this meeting. Agree to have next teleconf on April 04 2006. Bob f moved to adjourn, Jeff M seconded. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]