OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp-wsia message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#106] Uniqueness of entityHandles


Good point.

But it's not that cloneEntity returns a new entity, it's that it returns the
same entity.

What the spec should say in this case, is that the "cloneEntity CAN return
the same entity in case there is no provider-side difference between the
two".

Thus we get back to the entity <==> handle.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tamari, Yossi [mailto:yossi.tamari@sap.com]
Sent: Wed, October 09, 2002 11:15
To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#106] Uniqueness of entityHandles


While Gil is obviously correct in theory, it might useful in practice to
allow a producer to return the same handle as a result of CloneEntity. If
this entity has no persistence, there doesn't seem to be a need for a
different handle, and it removes the need for this simple producer of
dealing with multiple entityHandles.

	Yossi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 6:41 AM
To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#106] Uniqueness of entityHandles


How can it be other than a MUST? If two entities have the same handle, then
they are, by definition, the same entity. This is not even a MUST - it is
evident by the very nature of the definition of a handle as a unique
identifier of something.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com]
Sent: Wed, October 09, 2002 06:38
To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [I#106] Uniqueness of entityHandles


Topic: Interface
Class: Technical
Raised by: Rich Thompson
Title: Uniqueness of entityHandles
Date Added: 9-Oct-2002
Document Section: Interfaces/6
Description:
Do we want a statement about uniqueness of entity handles within the scope
of a registration? Would it be a SHOULD or a MUST?


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC