[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [wsrp-wsia] RE: [wsia] 10-17 Minutes
I agree. On your first point, that is why the statement relative to syncing with JSR168 needs to be that WSRP provides a superset of the JSR functionality. The discussion around the second point is that simpler Producers may be limited in a variety of ways, but we are trying to keep the limitations as small as possible. Rudnicki Joseph G CONT NSSC To: "'Rex Brooks'" <rexb@starbourne.com>, <RudnickiJG@NAVSE wsia@lists.oasis-open.org A.NAVY.MIL> cc: Subject: RE: [wsia] 10-17 Minutes 10/18/2002 10:27 AM Hello, I am getting a little concerned on two counts: 1. The emphasis on JSR 168 to the exclusion of more general support for a variety of portlets, and 2. The discussions tending toward 1 portlet per producer instead of multiple portlets per producer. I think that we need a specification that will allow any portal developer to write a consumer that will contain any and all of their portlets. This producer can then connect to a consumer (again associated with any portal) that will display and operate the producer's portlets (essentially) as if they were running in the consumer's portal. Do either of my two concerns listed above have any merit? Take care. Joe Rudnicki
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC