[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] [I#104] Proposed resolution: WSRP recommends thatportals not do user-mapping
Good step in the correct (IMHO), and likeliest, direction. Rex At 1:43 PM +0200 10/27/02, Gil Tayar wrote: >Issue: 104 >Title: WSRP recommends that portals not do user-mapping >Resolution Date: 10-Nov-2002 >Status: Tentative resolve >Proposed Resolution: The language was changed in v0.8 to recognize >Consumers may supply user information in a variety of means, but that the >entity ultimately has to be ready to request this information directly from >the End-User. Current language: > > "It is anticipated that some entities will interact with one or more > back-end applications that require a user identity for the End-User. If > the user identity required by the back-end application is not the same as > that authenticated or otherwise supplied by the Consumer, the entity > SHOULD require the End-User to provide the necessary information > (preferably using secure transport) for use with the back-end application > via markup interactions (e.g. display a form that prompts for a user > identity and any security tokens (such as a password) for the back-end > system)." > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> -- Rex Brooks Starbourne Communications Design 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA 94702 *510-849-2309 http://www.starbourne.com * rexb@starbourne.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC