OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp-wsia message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] RE: [wsrp-wsia][I#106] Proposed resolution: Uniquenessof Entity Handles







People found it confusing to have this named consumerHandle as a Consumer
MAY have several of them with any one particular Producer. You have a
contradiction between reminding us that registration is optional and
desiring this to be scoped to a registrationHandle (which is the current
statement). I could see adding a parenthetical statement extending this
uniqueness to the Producer scope for those Producer's not requiring
Consumers to register (either in-band or out-of-band).



                                                                                                                   
                      Gil Tayar                                                                                    
                      <Gil.Tayar@webcol        To:       wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org                            
                      lage.com>                cc:                                                                 
                                               Subject:  [wsrp-wsia] RE: [wsrp-wsia][I#106] Proposed resolution:   
                      10/27/2002 06:50          Uniqueness of Entity Handles                                       
                      AM                                                                                           
                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                   



Rich,

I believe we should not define entityHandle to be scoped to something that
is optional. What happens if no registration was done? I believe this
should
be scoped to "registrationHandle".

Actually, to go even further, I would say that registrationHandle should be
just named "consumerHandle", or maybe "consumerId" to denote its
persistence, because it may not even have created through a registration
process.


-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com]
Sent: Sun, October 27, 2002 13:43
To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-wsia][I#106] Proposed resolution: Uniqueness of Entity
Handles


Issue:  106
Title:  Uniqueness of Entity Handles
Resolution Date: 10-Nov-2002
Status: Tentative resolve
Proposed Resolution: Draft v0.81 (small grammar update) describes an
entityHandle in section 7.1.4 as "An opaque and invariant handle, unique
within the context of the Consumer’s registration, which the Producer is
supplying for use on future invocations targeted at the new entity."



----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC