RE: [wsrp-wsia] e-Mail Vote on Issue #59 (refined)

[Ravi Konuru <rkonuru@us.ibm.com>]

I vote yes.

Ravi Konuru



                                                                                                                               
                      Andre Kramer                                                                                             
                      <andre.kramer@eu.        To:       wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org                                        
                      citrix.com>              cc:                                                                             
                                               Subject:  RE: [wsrp-wsia] e-Mail Vote on Issue #59 (refined)                    
                      11/15/2002 12:33                                                                                         
                      PM                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                               



I vote Yes.

             -- Andre

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Schaeck [mailto:SCHAECK@de.ibm.com]
Sent: 15 November 2002 16:41
To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-wsia] e-Mail Vote on Issue #59 (refined)




Dear WSRP and WSIA TC Members,

I put up the following issue for an e-mail vote (ending 1 week after this
notice goes out) - the following summarizes the discussion for this issue
(thanks Rich !)

Issue #59 (refined) - Keep the wsdlURL field in ServiceDescription?

Arguments in favor:
 - If this was an infrastructural portType (has that flavor), this would be
THE required field.
 - This provides a standardized place to produce a dynamic WSDL that
reflects the Consumer's registration.

Arguments against:
 - Since we are above the infrastructural level, this information has to be
already known in order to invoke getServiceDescription().
 - If the infrastructural level provides such information in the future, it
will be redundant and likely incompatible
 - Not critical for v1.0 ... can be an extension for those wishing to
provide the dynamic WSDL concept.
 - Assumes the signature will not change for future versions of the spec.
 - Belongs as part of the discovery process rather than as part of the
service.

Best regards,

Thomas

Thomas Schaeck
Chairman OASIS WSRP TC



----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>