Re: [wsrp-wsia] e-Mail Vote on Issue #59 (refined)

[Carsten Leue <CLEUE@de.ibm.com>]

I vote "in favor".


Best regards
Carsten Leue

-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401



                                                                           
             Thomas                                                        
             Schaeck/Germany/I                                             
             BM@IBMDE                                                   To 
                                       wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org      
             11/15/2002 05:40                                           cc 
             PM                                                            
                                                                   Subject 
                                       [wsrp-wsia] e-Mail Vote on Issue    
                                       #59 (refined)                       
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           






Dear WSRP and WSIA TC Members,

I put up the following issue for an e-mail vote (ending 1 week after this
notice goes out) - the following summarizes the discussion for this issue
(thanks Rich !)

Issue #59 (refined) - Keep the wsdlURL field in ServiceDescription?

Arguments in favor:
 - If this was an infrastructural portType (has that flavor), this would be
THE required field.
 - This provides a standardized place to produce a dynamic WSDL that
reflects the Consumer's registration.

Arguments against:
 - Since we are above the infrastructural level, this information has to be
already known in order to invoke getServiceDescription().
 - If the infrastructural level provides such information in the future, it
will be redundant and likely incompatible
 - Not critical for v1.0 ... can be an extension for those wishing to
provide the dynamic WSDL concept.
 - Assumes the signature will not change for future versions of the spec.
 - Belongs as part of the discovery process rather than as part of the
service.

Best regards,

Thomas

Thomas Schaeck
Chairman OASIS WSRP TC



----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>