Re: [wsrp-wsia] [I#154] Proposed Resolution: Rename "entity" to"portlet"

[Thomas Schaeck <SCHAECK@de.ibm.com>]

We have to be very careful here since we have two different kinds of
entities - it would make sense to rename "producer offered entities" to
"portlets", but I don't think it would make sense to use the term "portlet"
for "consumer configures entity".

Best regards,

Thomas



Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS on 12/09/2002 06:33:29 PM

To:    wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
Subject:    Re: [wsrp-wsia] [I#154] Proposed Resolution: Rename "entity" to
       "portlet"








This was a question we said at the Nov F2F that we would allow to sit for a
few weeks. Seeing as there have been no replies to this issue, I propose
that we resolve it by renaming entities to portlets throughout the spec.
This aligns with the name of the spec and thereby will help guide the
spec's readers.

Rich Thompson




                      Gil Tayar
                      <Gil.Tayar@webcol        To:
                      wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
                      lage.com>                cc:
                                               Subject:  [wsrp-wsia]
                      [I#154] Rename "entity" to "portlet" or
                      11/24/2002 06:50          "portlet type"
                      AM





Issue: 154
Status: Active
Topic: general
Class: Technical
Raised by: Eilon Reshef
Title: Rename "entity" to "portlet" or "portlet type"
Date Added: 7-Nov-2002
Document Section:
Description:
As the word "entity" is too general, and because we have finally given a
name to the thing that we are "showing", why not rename entity to "portlet"
or "portlet type"



----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>