[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [wsrp-wsia] Minutes for 7 January 2003 Meeting
<Many thanks to Rich and Gil for their issues posts after the meeting>
<note to website maintainer: the company name "Reed-Elsivier" should be
"Reed-Elsevier">
WSRP Members Attendance:
Aickin, Sasha Plumtree Yes
Allamaraju, Subbu BEA Yes
Atkinson, Olin Novell Yes
Blich, Amir SAP No
Braun, Chris Novell Yes
Brooks, Rex Starbourne Yes
Cox, T. J. Novell No
Cox, William BEA Yes
Dirking, Brian Stellent No
Drye, Stephen Art Technology Yes
Dyinin, Jane Plumtree No
Fillicetti, Gino Bowstreet No
Freedman, Michael Oracle Yes
Jacob, Richard IBM Yes
Klein, Jon Reed-Elsevier No
Kramer, Andre Citrix Yes
Kropp, Alan Vignette Corporation Yes
Leue, Carsten IBM Yes
Machak, Dan Tibco Yes
Martin, Monica Drake Certivo Yes
Mitsuoka, Madoka Fujitsu Yes
Nolen, Adam Reed-Elsevier No
Palas, Petr Moravia IT Yes
Pugsley, Ken Peoplesoft No
Randhawa, Sunit Fujitsu No
Ratcliffe, Nigel Factiva No
Reshef, Eilon WebCollage No
Rudnicki, Joe U.S. Navy Yes
Schaeck, Thomas IBM Yes
Shumaker, Gennady SAP Yes
Smith, Steven Capitol College Yes
Stanko, Joseph Plumtree Yes
Tayar, Gil WebCollage Yes
Thompson, Rich IBM Yes
Tamari, Yossi SAP Portals Yes
van Lydegraf, Eric Kinzan Yes
Wiecha, Charles IBM Yes
Young, Michael Plumtree Yes
Members on Leave of Absence:
Abdelnur, Alejandro Sun until 26 January
Ramesh, Raj CommerceOne until 15 January
Prospective Members:
Rubini, Ross Plumtree Yes
27 of 38 voting members attending
Meeting started at 12:05pm EST
Minutes from 19 December 2003 approved with 3 corrections made by Rich.
These items should read as follows:
#154 Discussion
- We are not currently synchronized with JSR168
- We have not decided to synchronize with JSR168
- Gil will produce 3 versions for the Primer (such as
configuredPortlet)
Will not change API names
#173 Summary not yet added
- Will will try the overview section in the next version
#174 Roles: Change "must" to "must not"
- no objections, but this is tentative relative to
resolution of #185
Minutes from 2 January 2003 approved
Gil will post an updated issue list.
Rich will post an updated version of the spec by the end of the week (maybe
called version .87 or .88).
#169 Does refresh page (F5/Ctrl+R) re-invoke performBlockingInteraction?
- Up to the Consumer implementation.
- Many will do a redirect so a refresh is just a getMarkup()
- Producer must be prepared for End User pusihg the button a
second time
- Resolved to add text to spec and primer
#183 markup charset differen to the same as the XML response charset?
- resolved: set a note to the editors that they are to be kept the
same (attachments are excluded)
#170 Scope of Producer-Consumer HTTP session
- resolved: maximum scope is the scope of the Consumer client's
logical session (vague about what a session is)
#154 Rename "entity" to "portlet" (re-opened due to JSR168 change)
- resolved:Use "portlet" where no distinction is necessary. Use
Producer configured-portlet and Consumer configured-portlet where the
distinction is necessary
#185 Remove concept of Roles from the spec
- resolved: Rename "role" to "usercategory"
- resolved: Leave "usercategory" in userContext
#174 The Consumer SHOULD NOT assert a role for a role which ...
- tentative resolve: change to 'MUST NOT"
- tentative resolve: add text that all supported userCategories
MUST be declared (including predefined terms)
#175 Roles should be per-Entity and not per-Producer
- resolved: leave as is
#184 Can performInteraction return new navigationalState?
- resolved: No, cannot return new navigationalState. Operation is just
getMarkup() plus interactionParams
#181 Registration Changes
- resolved: leave in for version 1. May still need to work out the details
- Revisit for version 2.
#179 requestParameter semantics unclear
-resolved:
+ Remove requestParameters
+ Add interactionState to interactionParams
+ Add text about navigationalState reflects how to regenerate the page,
interactionState reflects input to perform*interaction
+ Add text around what navigationalState to use when returning markup
from BlockingInteraction
+ Add text about Consumer's processing URL activation
Next meeting will be Thursday, 9 January at 5pm German time/11am EST/8am
Pacific
Details about the next face-to-face meeting will be posted on the website
tomorrow.
meeting ended 1:39pm EST
-Steven
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC