[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #62] Producer caution on returningmarkup
Should this go into the spec or into the primer? It seems evident to me. Best regards Carsten Leue ------- Dr. Carsten Leue Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401 Rich Thompson/Watson/I BM@IBMUS To wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org 01/24/2003 06:01 cc PM Subject [wsrp-wsia] [change request #62] Producer caution on returning markup Document: Spec Section: 6.3.2 Page/Line: 41/41 Requestedby: Michael Freedman Old text: Since this operation .... Proposed text: Note, if the Producer chooses to use the optimized form of this operation and return markup directly, care must be taken to ensure the markup is generated with the navigationalState that is the result of executing the operation and not the navigational state that was passed to it. This ensures consistency when the optimization is not used and the Consumer invokes getMarkup() after performBlockingInteraction() returns. Reasoning: I like it better ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC