[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp][markup] First conference call (Summary)
I think we can specify the allowed / forbidden tags that should apply both for HTML / (X)HTML and should (at least) specify that WSRP services *should* output valid XHTML, not just HTML. I don't think we should go so far to mandate that WSRP services *must* output valid XHTML. We definitively should define valid XHTML fragments, but I think we also should cover what are valid HTML fragments. Best regards, Thomas Thomas Schaeck "PAVLIK,GREGORY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <gregory_pavlik@hp.com> on 04/10/2002 05:47:56 PM Please respond to "PAVLIK,GREGORY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <gregory_pavlik@hp.com> To: Thomas Schaeck/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, Takao Mohri <mohri.takao@jp.fujitsu.com> cc: "PAVLIK,GREGORY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <gregory_pavlik@hp.com>, "WSRP Mailing List (E-mail)" <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: RE: [wsrp][markup] First conference call (Summary) Is there a general statement on whether the markup subcommittee intends to treat HTML and XHTML interchangeably? My initial thought was that WSRP would do better to standardize on XHTML, which would have a number of advantages including the ability of the consumer to treat the fragment as an XML fragment. It's not terribly difficult to tidy up a piece of HTML and repurpose it as well-formed/valid XHTML when dealing with legacy content. An early focus on XHTML might position us better for dealing with devices in the long run, as it appears that WML and cHTML are going to be secondary targets for the TC. Greg -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Schaeck [mailto:SCHAECK@de.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:43 PM To: Takao Mohri Cc: PAVLIK,GREGORY (HP-NewJersey,ex2); WSRP Mailing List (E-mail) Subject: Re: [wsrp][markup] First conference call (Summary) There is not something like "the markup language of WSRP", the WSRP protocol needs not to be tied to any particular markup language, the protocol and the markup exchanged can be viewed as orthogonal. However, WSRP will need to define rules for valid markup fragments and common styles with the priorities 1. (X)HTML 2. WML, cHTML, VoiceXML... It would be interesting to see the rules that would define valid XHTML Basic fragments. Takao, could you post an XHTML Basic example document to the mailing list and an outline of fragment rules for XHTML Basic ? Which tags would be allowed in aggregatable XHTML Basic fragments and which tags would not be allowed to use in fragments ? Best regards, Thomas Takao Mohri <mohri.takao@jp.fujitsu.com> on 04/09/2002 01:26:58 PM Please respond to Takao Mohri <mohri.takao@jp.fujitsu.com> To: "PAVLIK,GREGORY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <gregory_pavlik@hp.com> cc: "WSRP Mailing List (E-mail)" <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [wsrp][markup] First conference call (Summary) Greg, Yes, as you mentioned, XHTML Basic is becoming a standard for cellular phones. In WAP 2.0, XHTML Mobile Profile (an extention of XHTML Basic) is a standard markup language. In Japan, cellular phones that support WAP 2.0 are already on sale by KDDI. NTT Docomo also has announced support of WAP 2.0. In the near future, WAP 2.0, i.e, XTHML Basic will be used by many mobile devices. If the markup language of WSRP is based on XHTML Basic, it makes support of mobile devices much easier. Regards, Takao "PAVLIK,GREGORY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" wrote: > > Gino, > > Could you clarify if your intent is to consider XHMTL/XHTML Basic as a part > of the HTML focus? This wasn't clear from the notes. There appears to be a > broad convergence in the mobile space, both with respect to WML and NTT > Docomo, to standardizing on XHTML Basic + CSS. XHTML is going to be here on > the device very soon, perhaps quicker than on the desktop, making this a > relatively high priority item. Fujitsu may have some comments on this as > well. > > Greg > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gino Filicetti [mailto:gfilicetti@bowstreet.com] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:22 PM > To: WSRP Mailing List (E-mail) > Subject: [wsrp][markup] First conference call (Summary) > > Team, > > Attached are the meeting notes from today's Markup Subcommittee meeting. > Comments and suggestions are welcome. > > One thing I did notice was that there were quite a few participants today > that aren't on the actual list of official members for this team. Since this > team is quite small, I think it'd be great if we could get some of you to > officially join and help out with the effort. Unfortunately, I wasn't able > to capture the names of ALL the attendees this time around (I'll be sure to > record the con-call next time), but please send me an email so we can add > your name to official list and flesh out the team a little more. > > Currently, the official list is: > > Gino Filicetti > David Taieb > Khurram Mahmood > Susan Levine > Michael Hillerman > > Thanks, > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Gino Filicetti | Software Engineer > One Harbour Place, Portsmouth, NH 03801 > T 603.559.1692 | gfilicetti@bowstreet.com > w w w . b o w s t r e e t . c o m > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> // Takao MOHRI (mohri.takao@jp.fujitsu.com) // FUJITSU LABORATORIES LTD. ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC