Subject: RE: [wsrp] [change request #250] Only 1 performBlockingInteraction()?
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: 26 March 2003 19:59
Subject: [wsrp] [change request #250] Only 1 performBlockingInteraction()?
Requested by: Michael Freedman
Old text: The Consumer MUST initiate at most one performBlockingInteraction() for any one client request.
New text: remove this newly added line
Reasoning: Do we really want to restrict ourselves by this for the future? As we haven't addressed events yet, should we be cautious to not handtie us if we find a use case/rationale that through handling of events would cause another blocking action to be called? What is the harm of NOT limiting ourselves. As long as each adheres to blocking rule it would seem safe.