[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp] [errata #8] JSR168 description
Still sounds odd (a standard spec?) ... how about:
JSR 168 - Java Community Process effort defining the Java Portlet Specification.
Rich Thompson
Alejandro Abdelnur <Alejandro.Abdelnur@Sun.COM> 04/25/2003 01:20 PM
To: Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, Alejandro Abdelnur <Alejandro.Abdelnur@Sun.COM>
cc:
Subject: Re: [wsrp] [errata #8] JSR168 description
Rich,
"standardizing the Java Portlet Specification" sounds odd. I would suggest "defining a standard Java Portlet Specification".
Regards.
Alejandro
Rich Thompson wrote:
Comment:
8. 4/24/03 (William Cox)
Section 3.1.2: "JSR168 – Java Community Process for standardizing a portlet API." should be written "JSR 168 - a Java Community Process effort for standardizing the Java Portlet Specification"
Document: Spec
Section: 3.1.2
Old Text: JSR168 – Java Community Process for standardizing a portlet API.
New Text: JSR 168 - Java Community Process effort for standardizing the Java Portlet Specification.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]