RE: [wsrp] Issue #29: Is metadata needed to indicate support forgetResou

forgetResource (subject)? Forward or backwards interop can be by degrading the HTML or falling back to HTTP but I would encourage 2.0 (consumer) implementations to support getResource and 2.0 producers to also provide a 1.0 service.

Regards,

Andre

From: Michael Freedman [mailto:Michael.Freedman@oracle.com]
Sent: 21 December 2004 17:55
To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsrp] Issue #29: Is metadata needed to indicate support forgetResource?

And vice-versa: so a producer can adapt to run in a 1.0 consumer.

Rich Thompson wrote:

Issue # 29
Spec section:
SubCommittee: Interfaces
Owner: Andre
Description: Isn't metadata needed to tell a Consumer whether or not a Producer supports getResource (or is it always supported if urls encode for it and Consumers never invoke it unless a url has encoded wsrp-useOperation=true)?

wsrp message