wsrp message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp] Issue #33: Pass UserContext to lifetime operations?
- From: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
- To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:43:16 -0500
I would argue against the lifetime operations
taking a user context as the underlying resources are not user-specific
and the Consumer is the right control point for deciding whether or not
the end-user is allowed to see or impact the lifetime.
Rich
Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>
12/22/2004 10:34 AM
|
To
| Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS,
"'wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org'" <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [wsrp] Issue #33: Pass
UserContext to lifetime operations? |
|
I had considered portlet handle
leasing ops taking in a user context but then the question of whether a
consumer leases on a per user basis would arise. The call arg would then
typically set to null, as seems to happen a lot given the questions surrounding
userContexts in operations. But easy to add if we think it is required
for consistency.
Regards,
Andre
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 21 December 2004 16:55
To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp] Issue #33: Pass UserContext to lifetime operations?
Issue # 33
Spec section:
SubCommittee: Interfaces
Owner: Andre
Description: Should
the RegistrationLifetime and PortletLifetime portTypes' operations take
a userContext for consistency?
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]