wsrp message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp] Issue #41: use wsdl rather than wsrp metadata for supportedfactories?
- From: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
- To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:02:40 -0500
Having now seen the impacts of having
these factories in the PortletManagement portType, I would prefer to move
them to their own portTypes and use the composability of wsdl to indicate
what is supported.
Rich
Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
02/22/2005 02:19 PM
|
To
| wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [wsrp] Issue #41: use wsdl
rather than wsrp metadata for supported factories? |
|
Issue # 41
Spec section:
SubCommittee: Interfaces
Owner: Rich
Description: Rather
than having our own metadata for supported factories, move the new factories
into additional portTypes and use WSDL to indicate what is supported. Note,
the reasons for first placing them in the PortletManagement portType were:
1. Encourage their implementation as many implementations
are expected to implement this portType (for destroyPortlets if nothing
else).
2. Reduce the explosion of portTypes
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]