OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsrp] Issue #37: Recommend portlet handles be UIDs?


Remember this uniqueness is about POP handles only.  POPs aren't scoped 
to registrations and aren't imported/exported.
     -Mike-

Richard Jacob wrote:

>
>
>right,
>and how does that fit with our statement that portlet handles are scoped by
>the registration only?
>Didn't we say for the import/export feature that producers/vendors
>supporting migration accross Producers need to make sure they do the right
>stuff to handle this?
>We have even a means for that in the protocol.
>I agree that it is a good idea to have some form of uniqueness for portlet
>handles but we shouldn't require it.
>Also versioning comes into play here, right?
>
>Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,
>
>        Richard Jacob
>______________________________________________________
>IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
>Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
>WSRP Standardization Technical Lead
>Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469  -  Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
>Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com
>
>
>                                                                           
>             Subbu Allamaraju                                              
>             <subbu@bea.com>                                               
>                                                                        To 
>             01/14/2005 10:05          wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org           
>             PM                                                         cc 
>                                                                           
>                                                                   Subject 
>                                       Re: [wsrp] Issue #37: Recommend     
>                                       portlet handles be UIDs?            
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>
>
>
>
>Currently, Consumers are not supposed to care about the structure/format
>of portletHandles. Could you elaborate on the motivation for this
>recommendation?
>
>Subbu
>
>Rich Thompson wrote:
>  
>
>>Issue # 37
>>Spec section:
>>SubCommittee: Interfaces
>>Owner: Mike
>>Description: Add recommendation that at least POP handles, and
>>preferably all portlet handles, be some form of UID as newer portlet
>>factories potentially cross registration and Producer boundaries.
>>    
>>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
>the OASIS TC), go to
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/members/leave_workgroup.php
>.
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>  
>




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]