Some commets on CR304a

[Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>]

Regarding the purpose and role of the extra namespace, Mike and others 
have pointed that types in this namespace could be used to provide some 
formal mapping between JSR168 and WSRP.

I can see the value, but I was wondering if anyone tried using 
NamedString to define such mappings, and willing to share some examples?

Based on some samples I tried out, it seems that we cannot guarantee 
interop between implementations with the current definition of 
NamedString. If there is a strong requirement for using this type in 
extensions, should we consider changing the type of the "name" attribute 
from "xs:string" to QName?

If we decide to keep this element, I would also suggest renaming 
NamedString to something else in the extra namespace to avoid confusion.

Rich - I noticed that the NamedString definitions in v1 and extra 
schemas are slightly different. The extra namespace uses value as an 
attribute while v1 defines value as an element. Was this intentional?

Subbu