Re: [wsrp] Some commets on CR304a

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

Here is a modified version of the extra
namespace definitions for people's comments. I think this incorporates
people's concerns todate (not really related to v2, confusion with duplicated
type names and the name attribute should really be of type QName).

Let me know what people think ... particularly
of the suggestion to drop StringArray.



Rich

Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>

05/25/05 01:35 PM

To	wsrp <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	[wsrp] Some commets on CR304a

Regarding the purpose and role of the extra namespace,
Mike and others 
have pointed that types in this namespace could be used to provide some
formal mapping between JSR168 and WSRP.

I can see the value, but I was wondering if anyone tried using 
NamedString to define such mappings, and willing to share some examples?

Based on some samples I tried out, it seems that we cannot guarantee 
interop between implementations with the current definition of 
NamedString. If there is a strong requirement for using this type in 
extensions, should we consider changing the type of the "name"
attribute 
from "xs:string" to QName?

If we decide to keep this element, I would also suggest renaming 
NamedString to something else in the extra namespace to avoid confusion.

Rich - I noticed that the NamedString definitions in v1 and extra 
schemas are slightly different. The extra namespace uses value as an 
attribute while v1 defines value as an element. Was this intentional?

Subbu


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

wsrp_extra.xsd