RE: [wsrp] Remove section 9.3?

[Richard Jacob <richard.jacob@de.ibm.com>]

I tend to agree with Andre here.
Let's keep it as a placeholder.
I hope to be able to begin with the security tech note in August.
I still have a surgery outstanding which will take me out till the first or
second week of august.
If volunteers want to start before this date, please feel free.

Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,

        Richard Jacob
______________________________________________________
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
WSRP Team Lead & Technical Lead
WSRP Standardization
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469  -  Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com


                                                                           
             "Andre Kramer"                                                
             <andre.kramer@eu.                                             
             citrix.com>                                                To 
                                       "Rich Thompson"                     
             07/07/2005 11:42          <richt2@us.ibm.com>, "wsrp"         
             AM                        <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>         
                                                                        cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
                                       RE: [wsrp] Remove section 9.3?      
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Section 9.3  justifies our AccessDenied fault code in section 13. For the
whole chapter, I would argue that every WS spec must have a security
section, even if it is largely a placeholder.

Regards,
Andre


From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 05 July 2005 21:46
To: wsrp
Subject: [wsrp] Remove section 9.3?


In the editorial comments Subbu sent to me, he questioned the value of
maintaining section 9.3 in the spec. I recall suggesting this removal in
the v1 timeframe and therefore am not the appropriate person to defend it.
Anyone care to post reasons to keep this section?

Rich