OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsrp] Use of spec defined types in extensions


> 
> BTW: we need to think of a better "name" for the extra namespace prior 
> to publication ... perhaps wsrp-ext.

I agree. wsrp-ext sounds better.

Subbu

> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> *Richard Jacob <richard.jacob@de.ibm.com>*
> 
> 08/25/05 10:38 AM
> 
> 	
> To
> 	Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>
> cc
> 	wsrp <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Subject
> 	Re: [wsrp] Use of spec defined types in extensions
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> where do we say that?
> I thought we discussed explicitly that we want reuse of our structures in
> some cases.
> NamedString was the famous example here.
> 
> Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,
> 
>        Richard Jacob
> ______________________________________________________
> IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
> Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
> WSRP Team Lead & Technical Lead
> WSRP Standardization
> Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469  -  Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
> Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com
> 
> 
>                                                                          
>             Subbu Allamaraju                                              
>             <subbu@bea.com>                                              
>                                                                        To
>             08/22/2005 04:17          wsrp <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>    
>             PM                                                         cc
>                                                                          
>                                                                   Subject
>                                       [wsrp] Use of spec defined types in
>                                       extensions                          
>                                                                          
>                                                                          
>                                                                          
>                                                                          
>                                                                          
>                                                                          
> 
> 
> 
> 
> In the v2 draft, we say that implementations should not use v2 types in
> extensions. Does anyone see reasons to also exclude v1 types in v2
> extensions?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Subbu
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To 
> unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
> OASIS at: 
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]