[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp] extendedURLParameters question
Unfortunatly I haven't been part of the discussion last week, so I might miss the context. However this parameter is scoped to the request only, and by request scope I mean the WSRP request. We don't have a definition of what the user interaction scope is per se. And we have no tie of the operation considering the preservation of state between these. These parameters are mainly intended to allow browsers/client side scripting to extend the URL params (if the Consumer portal is capable of handling it) and pass them back to the portlet. This can only be request scoped. The Consumers have no idea about the intended semantics of the params. There are certainly use cases were the portlet expects these to be request scoped only. It seems also very natural for me, since all request params (extended or not) are request scope. It seems we're trying to include the user requet life time in the very last minute again. Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards, Richard Jacob ______________________________________________________ IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development WSRP Technical Lead WSRP Standardization Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888 Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com> To 09/25/06 03:03 PM OASIS WSRP TC <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org> cc Subject [wsrp] extendedURLParameters question I have a question regarding sending extended URL parameters. Is a consumer allowed to send these parameters on more than one markup operation during the scope of the client request that included these parameters? In particular, if a blockingAction URL contained extended URL parameters, is it valid for the consumer to send these parameters on the following requests during the scope of the same client request - pbia - handleEvents (only to the portlet that initiated the request) - getMarkup (only to the portlet that initiated the request) The statement "Consumers MUST NOT resend a particular set of wsrp-extra:extendedURLParameters on later invocations of WSRP defined operations" in Sec 12.2 seems to be preventing this. During last week's interfaces call, it was pointed out that the request ID notion for the ajax discussion can be mapped to extended URL parameters, and this conformance statement stands in the way. Is there a reason not to relax this statement by adding "beyond the scope of the current request". Regards, Subbu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]