RE: [wss] 2nd draft of interop 1 scenarios

Good point – I'll add for the next draft – I'd suggest that we all use SOAP 1.1 since it is the most widely used.

From: Eric Gravengaard [mailto:eric@reactivity.com]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Chris Kaler; Web Services Security
Subject: RE: [wss] 2nd draft of interop 1 scenarios

Chris,

You use the SOAP/1.1 envelope namespace in your scenarios for the interop. The current version of the spec uses the SOAP/1.2 envelope namespace. Can we agree to use the 1.1 namespace for interop or should we expect a mixture of SOAP versions? I believe it will be easier to get interop to work if we are all using the same namespace, but we should be aware that S:role is only available in the 1.2 namespace.

-Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Kaler [mailto:ckaler@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:26 AM
To: Web Services Security
Subject: [wss] 2nd draft of interop 1 scenarios

Revised based on discussions from Tuesday's call

wss message