Re: [wss] Issue 196: QNames

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>]

>I think qnames make implementation harder (they really are a layering
>violation:), and the security/c14n intricacies are very difficult to
>properly specify, let alone implement.

I don't understand you comments, are you saying that you can't implement
qnames ? Also can you point me to where its stated that its a "layering
violation".

>The sooner we move to pure-URI the better off, and more secure, we'll all
be.

Elaborate please.


Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122