RE: [wss] Critical ISSUE (RE: [wss-comment] Enumerations of QName faultcodes)

[Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>]

Maybe Gudge would treat us to an example?

Thanks,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295

Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> wrote on 01/30/2004 05:54:47 PM:

> > It's not a question of whether we use Qnames or URIs. SOAP forces us 
to
> > use Qnames. The problem is that it's *very* *very* bad to apply an
> > "enumeration" restriction to a Qname in element or attribute content,
> > and the WSS .xsd does exactly that.
> 
> Gudge has this trick he showed off at the WS-I face to face yesterday,
> he calls it "open enumeration."
> 
> Make the item in question be a union of string/enumeration and qname.
> 
>    /r$
> 
> --
> Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
> DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
> XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
> XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
the OASIS TC), go to 
> 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>