Re: [wss] about Hitachi's negative vote

[Anne Thomas Manes <anne@manes.net>]

Michael,

While it's true that WS-I can resolve this ambiguity, I think that Kudo-san 
is correct that this ambiguity should be resolved in the actual specification.

Anne

At 10:33 AM 4/5/2004, Michael McIntosh wrote:

>Kudo-san,
>
>This appears to be the first time this problem (from the 3rd interop) has 
>been discussed on the list. As you know the WS-I BSP WG is working on a 
>profile in an attempt to address issues such as this. I encourage you and 
>all vendors to participate in the BSP WG to insure that the profile covers 
>any interop failures you encounter during testing. For future reference, 
>Ted Burghart is the Hitachi representative to the WG.
>
>I will submit the following proposal to the BSP WG for statements to be 
>added to the profile:
>
>URI fragments defined in WSS: SOAP Message Security 1.0 are relative to a 
>base URI of 
>http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0 
>
>
>URI fragments defined in WSS: UsernameToken Profile 1.0 are relative to a 
>base URI of
>http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0 
>
>
>URI fragments defined in WSS: X.509 Certificate Token Profile 1.0 are 
>relative to a base URI of
>http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2003/12/oasis-200401-wss-x509-token-profile-1.0
>
>Thanks,
>Mike McIntosh

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anne Thomas Manes
VP & Research Director
Burton Group