RE: [wss] about Hitachi's negative vote

["Reid, Irving" <irving.reid@hp.com>]

I strongly agree that this clarification belongs in the OASIS WS-Security specifications, rather than being shuffled off to WS-I. I'm OK with it being in errata for 1.0, and fixed in the spec text for any future revisions.

 - irving -
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com] 
> Sent: April 5, 2004 11:05
> To: Michael McIntosh
> Cc: yutaka@sdl.hitachi.co.jp; wss@lists.oasis-open.org; 
> wsi_secprofile@lists.ws-i.org
> Subject: [wss] Re: [wsi_secprofile] Re: [wss] about Hitachi's 
> negative vote
> 
> 
> 
> This is probably the right thing to say, but WS-I BSP is the 
> wrong place 
> to say it; it must be part of WSS.  BSP could (and should) 
> say the URI's 
> MUST NOT be fragments.
> 
> > URI fragments defined in WSS: SOAP Message Security 1.0 are 
> relative 
> > to
> > a base URI of 
> > 
> http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-so
ap-message-security-1.0

I think WSS could reasonably claim that this is an editorial 
clarification and fix it in an errata.

	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html


To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup.php.