[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ACTION([Ron]: Propose what to do about SAML 2.0 assertion IDs.
wrt issue 334, I brought this up in the SS TC treleconf. I asked if the SS TC would consider reverting the name (ID) of saml 2.0 assertion identifiers back to the name (AssertionID) used for 1.0 and 1.1 assertion identifiers. I learned that the attributes are in different name spaces, and as such even if they had the same relative name, they would be different attributes. Thus our poposed resolution to issue 334, that is, adding AssertionID to the WSS core as a direct ID reference mechanism, would not be sufficient to sustain local direct references to SAML 2.0 Assertions. To sustain local direct references to SAML 2.0 Assertions, we would have to permit the use of the saml v2.0 ID attribute in local direct references. I recommend that we add both attributes to the WSS core as permitted/supported attributes in local direct references. Ron
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]