[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Public Comment
Comment from: gerald.brose@xtradyne.com Hi, when determining the applicable policy, only the policy target and the rules in the policies are considered. I am currently trying to map policies to XACML that have "lifetime" conditions on the policy itself (such as as activation date and an expiration date), which could be modeled a lot simpler if the XACML model and syntax allowed me to attach a condition to the policy element. Without it, I need to include the common activation/expiration date in every single rule of that policy (unless I have overlooked a more elegent design alternative). It is of course arguable if this example alone mandates a general extension of the base XACML model, but there may also be cases where one would want conditions on the policy computed (as the OR-expression of the rule conditions). This makes sense if there are common elements in the conditions of all rules, which could then be factored out. My apologies if this case this has been discussed at length on the TC list. Thanks for any references on this issue. Regards, Gerald Brose. -- Dr. Gerald Brose mailto:brose@xtradyne.com Xtradyne Technologies http://www.xtradyne.com Schoenhauser Allee 6-7, Phone: +49-30-440 306-27 D-10119 Berlin, Germany Fax : +49-30-440 306-78
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]