Re: [xacml-comment] Conformance tests

[Frederic Deleon <frederic.deleon@crf.canon.fr>]

Argyn,

Tests version we used is 0.3.

Frederic

Kuketayev, Argyn (Contractor) wrote:

>Frederic,
>
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Frederic Deleon [mailto:frederic.deleon@crf.canon.fr] 
>>Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 3:48 AM
>>To: Kuketayev, Argyn (Contractor)
>>Cc: xacml-comment@lists.oasis-open.org; Virginie PRIE
>>Subject: Re: [xacml-comment] Conformance tests
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>We passed conformance tests you defined.
>>It was globally correct for us.
>>    
>>
>
>Which version of conformance tests are you refering to?
>
>The matter is that, I've found a couple of bugs in a few tests, but
>didn't have time to update the test suite yet.
>
>  
>
>>However, 4 files were not valid for us: IID029Policy2.xml, 
>>IID030Policy2.xml, IIE001PolicySetId1.xml and IIE002PolicySetId1.xml.
>> From our point of view, these files do not satisfy the XACML schema. 
>>Indeed, they contain a Condition element with "FunctionId" 
>>attribute and "AttributeValue" sub-element.
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks for reporting these tests. I'll look at them.
>
>Thanks,
>Argyn
>  
>