[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml-dev] XACML 2
There are no plans. The RBAC profile has not yet been approved as a CD. It would be a test of how you implement your policy storage and retrieval mechanism, since the RBAC profile requires no changes or functional extensions to XACML. It is strictly a "profile" or paradigm for XACML usage. Can you suggest a conformance test that would be useful? The only thing I can think of is to pass in a Request containing a role attribute, having two Role PolicySets - one that applies and one that doesn't - and two Permission PolicySets - one for each role. The test would be verifying that only the applicable Permission PolicySet was applied. That is all standard XACML, so I don't think it is very useful. Anne On 29 September, Kuketayev, Argyn writes: RE: [xacml-dev] XACML 2 > From: "Kuketayev, Argyn" <argyn_kuketayev@fanniemae.com> > To: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM, xacml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xacml-dev] XACML 2 > Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:38:03 -0400 > > Are there any plans to have conformance tests or samples for RBAC > profile?\ > Argyn > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Anne Anderson [mailto:Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 9:31 AM > > To: xacml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: RE: [xacml-dev] XACML 2 > > > > > > On 28 September, Diego M. Gonzalez writes: RE: [xacml-dev] > > XACML 2 > I have finished the code that loads the policies > > and makes > difference for both versions. But I'll like to > > start with a > TDD environment for which I have to create > > some conformance > tests with the new schema and namespaces. > > > > Have you started with the conformance tests? Do you want > > to > use a common place to store them so any implementor can > > get > the tests, and provide feedback about them? > > > > Diego, > > > > The XACML TC has not discussed conformance tests for XACML > > 2.0. I have asked the chairs to put the topic on our agenda. > > Sun volunteered to do CTs for XACML 1.0, and IBM for XACML > > 1.1, but I don't know if IBM is interested in doing them for > > XACML 2.0. There is no requirement that a spec have CTs, but > > it certainly is valuable. > > > > Anne > > -- > > Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM > > Sun Microsystems Laboratories > > 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 > > Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692 > > > > -- Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]