[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] [model] Issues PM-2-02,PM-2-04: Applicability
"Polar Humenn" <polar@syr.edu> wrote: >But didn't we have some operator like "IF-THEN" > ><IF-THEN> > <...> > a complex predicate that SHOULD NOT evaluate to n/a > </...> > <INAPPLICABLE/> ></IF-THEN> > >It would have the same semantics as our applicability predicate. >With added semantics if the premise evaluated to INAPPLICABLE then the >entire expression is in Error. I did propose the <if></if><then></then> syntax, but people found that confusing. Since we already had the idea of "applicability rules" being in the "header" of the <applicablePolicy>, I thought perhaps having this more detailed "applicability rule" also in the header would be easier to swallow :-) Anne
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC