[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Re: policy model, part 1
On 14 February, Tim Moses writes: RE: [xacml] Re: policy model, part 1 > Anne - Is your concern at all alleviated by the fact that there is a > specified meta-policy, identified within the ruleStatement, that has to be > identical to the meta-policy identified in all the other rules with which > the rule can be combined? This should ensure that a rule-writer can deduce > what the effect of his or her rule will be. All the best. Tim. The following concern is alleviated: > Accommodating extensible semantics at the rule or referenced > policy level, where those semantics affect the base policy > evaluation, is incompatible with efficient hierarchical, > distributed policy evaluation. I had several other concerns that are independent. I have not had a chance to read your new 0.9 spec (THANKS!!!!) to see if my other concerns are addressed. Anne -- Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC