[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...
Great! Now, any clue about where to stay in Milan? Cheers, -Polar On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Carlisle Adams wrote: > Hi all, > > It's Monday morning, the votes are in, and here are the results... > > Firstly, we can trim down the choices somewhat: > - nobody seems to want to meet in San Francisco on the Saturday morning (it > received no votes, although Bill indicated that it would be as acceptable to > him as any of the other 2.5-day options), so the SF slot is W(pm)TF > - those voting for Milan either indicated no preference in days or chose > (b) (the only exception was Simon, who chose (a), but I'm assuming he would > not be opposed to (b)), so the Milan slot is MTW(am) > > Actual votes: > - Milan: Anne, Ernesto, Michiharu, Pierangela, Bill, Don, Polar, Simon > (8) > - SF: Anne, Ken, Michiharu, Bill (4) > > Extra information: > - I just spoke with Hal on the phone and he indicated that he could > probably attend either location, though he had a slight preference for > California (he was on vacation all last week and so was not able to cast a > vote in time) > - Tim indicated to me that Entrust would send one person to Milan but could > conceivably send two to SF > - I assume that Don, Polar, and Simon (who all voted for Milan) could also > go to SF if the meeting was there > > Totals: > - with the extra information above, we have the following numbers > - Milan: Anne, Ernesto, Michiharu, Pierangela, Bill, Don, Polar, Simon, > [Hal, 1-from-Entrust] (total = 10) > - SF: Anne, Ken, Michiharu, Bill, [Hal, Don, Polar, Simon, Carlisle, > Tim] (total = 10) > > Conclusion: > - potentially 10 people at either location, which would be quorum > - actual votes cast favoured Milan, and I did say that the most votes would > win > - therefore, Milan is the winner! > > Next F2F date, location, and duration: > - {Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday morning}, April 22-24, 2002, University of > Milan, Italy. > > > Thanks to everyone for your participation! > > Carlisle. > > P.S., If anyone has serious objections my reasoning above, get them out now > because those wanting 21-day advance bookings for cheaper fares will > probably need to book today... > > > > ---------- > > From: Carlisle Adams[SMTP:carlisle.adams@entrust.com] > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:02 PM > > To: xacml list; 'bill parducci' > > Subject: [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration... > > > > Hi all, > > > > Apologies for not getting this out earlier. I had agreed to send this > > after our TC concall last Thursday, but then was tied up the rest of that > > day and was traveling all day Friday. > > > > ---------- > > From: bill parducci[SMTP:bill@parducci.net] > > Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 10:18 PM > > To: xacml list > > Subject: [xacml] next f2f > > > > is there a timeline and/or mechanism for determining when and where > > the > > next f2f will occur? are we waiting for the next all-hands meeting? > > voting via e-mail? > > > > > > Yes, I'm calling for an e-mail vote which will close first thing Monday > > morning (April 1st). That is, I'll count whatever's in my in-box when I > > get into work on Monday morning. Votes should be sent to the list as a > > response to this message. > > > > There are a couple of things on which to vote. > > > > 1) Date and Location. The choices are as follows (pick one): > > a) Mon.-Tue., April 22-23 in Milan, Italy (hosted by Pierangela and > > Ernesto at U. Milan) > > b) Thu.-Fri., April 25-26 in San Francisco, USA (hosted by Ken > > Yagen at CrossLogix) > > c) either choice is acceptable > > d) I cannot attend either choice > > > > 2) Duration. There has been a proposal to add an extra half day to the > > meeting. The choices are as follows (pick one): > > > > a) MILAN: Mon. afternoon, Tue. full day, Wed. full day > > b) MILAN: Mon. full day, Tue. full day, Wed morning > > c) SF: Wed. afternoon, Thu. full day, Fri. full day > > d) SF: Thu. full day, Fri. full day, Sat. morning > > e) forget about the extra half day; two full days is enough > > > > The largest number of votes on each item wins. > > > > Our face-to-face meetings have been well-attended and very productive so > > far; hopefully, we can continue this tradition. > > > > Carlisle. > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC